Skip to content
tryhardprep
All lessons

Evaluating statistical claims: observational studies and experiments

11 minute read · 7 sections

Read first: Math: how the section works, Desmos basics for the test

0 of 7 sectionsSections

What the question looks like

You get a short paragraph about a study and four choices. Some questions add a table. The last line asks one of these:

  • “Which of the following is the largest population to which the results of the study can be generalized?”
  • “Based on the design of the study, what is the largest group to which these results can be applied?”
  • “Which of the following is the most appropriate conclusion based on the study?”

For the first two, each choice names a group. For the last one, each choice is a full sentence about what the study found.

There's nothing to calculate, so leave Desmos closed. Even when there's a table, you won't need to add anything in it. If the question gives an estimate with a How far an estimate from a sample could be off, like plus or minus 3%.Read the lesson, you want Inference from sample statistics instead.

Working through a question

A bike-share program has 2,0002{,}000 members. Of these, 900900 have yearly passes, and 360360 of the yearly pass holders live downtown. The program selects 5050 of those 360360 members at random and asks each one how satisfied they are with the bikes.

Which of the following is the largest population to which the results of the study can be generalized?

  • A. All 2,0002{,}000 members
  • B. The 900900 members with yearly passes
  • C. The 360360 yearly pass holders who live downtown
  • D. The 5050 members the program selected
  1. Find “at random” and see what it describes. Here it describes how the program picked people for the study. (When it describes who got which treatment, that's the cause question, further down.)
  2. Say the whole group they picked from before you look at the choices. The 5050 came from “those 360360 members,” and those are the yearly pass holders who live downtown. The 5050 are the sample, the people the study asked. The 360360 are the population, the group the results can describe.
  3. Match a choice to the group you said, word for word.
    • A and B are bigger groups. The other members in them had no chance of being picked, so the sample tells you nothing about them.
    • D is the sample itself. Picking at random lets the results reach everyone in the group the sample came from, and the question asks for the largest group.
    • C keeps both conditions, a yearly pass and living downtown, so C is correct.

“Largest” means the largest group the study lets you describe. The 2,0002{,}000 is the biggest number on the page, but that doesn't make it the answer.

Trap: Reaching too far

B, “The 900900 members with yearly passes,” uses a group straight from the paragraph. It just leaves out downtown.

What to do: Read the choice against the group you said in step 2. If it drops a condition, it takes in people who couldn't have been picked.

Trap: Stopping at the sample

D, “The 5050 members the program selected,” looks safe because those are the people the study asked.

What to do: In “selects 50 of those 360,” the 50 is the sample and the 360 is the population. Take the 360.

If the paragraph never says the sample was picked at random, as with volunteers or people who chose to send back a survey, the results describe only the people in the study. Measuring them carefully afterward doesn't change that.

Check every detail

A hiking club has 250250 members. Of these, 9090 have belonged to the club for at least 33 years, and 9090 led a hike last year. Omar selects 4040 members at random from the 9090 who have belonged for at least 33 years, then records their weekly miles for the next 1212 months.

What is the largest group to which Omar's results can be applied?

  • A. All 250250 members of the club
  • B. The 9090 members who led a hike last year
  • C. The members who have belonged to the club for at least 44 years
  • D. The 9090 members who had belonged to the club for at least 33 years on the day the study started

D is correct. A reaches too far, and the other two each change one detail.

Trap: Same number, different group

B, “The 9090 members who led a hike last year,” has the right number, and the group is in the paragraph. But Omar picked from members who had belonged for at least 33 years, and the hike leaders are a different 9090.

What to do: Check each detail of the choice against the sentence with “at random”: the number, the activity, the place and the years.

By the end of the study, every member Omar picked has belonged for at least 44 years, so C can look like an update.

Describe the group as it was when the sample was picked. Ages and years of membership keep growing while a study runs, but that doesn't change the group.

Right
The members who had belonged to the club for at least 3 years on the day the study started
Wrong
The members who have belonged to the club for at least 4 years

On the day the study started, “at least 4 years” leaves out members who had belonged for 3 to 4 years, and they could have been picked.

Now try one.

Worked example
100%
Table of 420 paint orders by resin-to-hardener ratio: 100 orders used 2:1, 160 used 3:1, and 160 used 4:1.

The table summarizes all paint orders received and completed at a shop during one month. Aziz selected at random 5656 of the 160160 orders received that month that used a resin-to-hardener ratio of 4:14:1. For each selected order, Aziz recorded whether the finished paint met the shop's viscosity standard.

Which of the following is the largest population to which the results of the study can be generalized?

  1. A

    All 420420 paint orders received that month

  2. B

    The 5656 paint orders Aziz selected

  3. C

    The 160160 orders received that month that used a resin-to-hardener ratio of 3:13:1

  4. D

    The 160160 orders received that month that used a resin-to-hardener ratio of 4:14:1

Show the answer
  • A

    All 420420 paint orders received that month

    This overgeneralizes by dropping the 4:14:1 A comparison of two amounts, like 3 to 5.Read the lesson requirement and extending the results to all 420420 orders, including orders with other ratios.

  • B

    The 5656 paint orders Aziz selected

    This treats the sample of 5656 selected orders as the population. Because those orders were randomly selected from the 160160 orders with a 4:14:1 A comparison of two amounts, like 3 to 5.Read the lesson, the results can be generalized to that larger group.

  • C

    The 160160 orders received that month that used a resin-to-hardener ratio of 3:13:1

    This keeps the count of 160160 but changes the resin-to-hardener A comparison of two amounts, like 3 to 5.Read the lesson from 4:14:1 to 3:13:1. Aziz sampled no orders from the 3:13:1 group.

  • D

    The 160160 orders received that month that used a resin-to-hardener ratio of 4:14:1

    Correct answer

    Aziz randomly selected the 5656 orders from the 160160 orders that used a 4:14:1 A comparison of two amounts, like 3 to 5.Read the lesson. Random sampling allows the results to be generalized to all 160160 orders in that group.

Solution

Identify the population from which the sample was randomly selected. Aziz chose 5656 orders at random from the 160160 orders that used a resin-to-hardener A comparison of two amounts, like 3 to 5.Read the lesson of 4:14:1. Because the sample was drawn randomly from those 160160 orders, the results can be generalized to all 160160 orders received that month that used a 4:14:1 ratio. The study cannot be generalized to all 420420 orders because the sample included only orders with that ratio.

When a table shows only part of the sample

A bus company runs 160160 trips a week, and 7070 of them are on its express route. A researcher randomly selects 3636 of those 7070 express trips. The table shows only the 2424 selected trips that carried at least 2525 riders.

Day25 to 34 riders35 or more riders
Weekday85
Weekend74

The researcher picked from the 7070 express trips, so they're the population. The table can't change that, and it doesn't matter that it shows fewer trips than were picked. The question asks about the results of the study, and the study measured every trip it picked.

Trap: The table's group

“Express trips that carried at least 2525 riders” comes from the sentence about the table and sounds precise. But the rider count was measured after the trips were picked, so it had nothing to do with which ones could be picked. “All trips that carried at least 2525 riders” is wrong too, and it also takes in other routes nobody picked from.

What to do: Cover the table and go back to the sentence with “at random.” The group named there is the answer.

Worked example
100%
Table for the 42 selected racks holding at least 6 trays. In the north chamber, 13 had space for another tray and 9 did not; in the south chamber, 8 had space and 12 did not.

Nilsen’s fish smokehouse uses 144 drying racks, some removable and some fixed in place. Bianca randomly selected 64 racks from the 96 removable drying racks at Nilsen’s fish smokehouse.

During one morning’s inspection, she recorded each selected rack’s location, the number of trays of fish it held, and whether it had enough unused space for another standard tray. Every selected rack was inspected. The table reports results only for the 42 selected racks holding at least 6 trays of fish. Of the other 22 selected racks, 10 had enough unused space for another standard tray and 12 did not.

Which of the following is the largest population to which the proportion of all 64 selected racks with space for another standard tray can be generalized?

  1. A

    The 42 inspected racks holding at least 6 trays of fish

  2. B

    The 96 removable drying racks at Nilsen’s fish smokehouse

  3. C

    All 144 drying racks used at Nilsen’s fish smokehouse during inspection

  4. D

    The 64 drying racks randomly selected for inspection at Nilsen’s smokehouse

Show the answer
  • A

    The 42 inspected racks holding at least 6 trays of fish

    The table’s 4242 racks are a subset of the 6464 selected racks; the Two ratios set equal to each other, which you can solve for a missing number.Read the lesson in the question also includes the results for the other 2222 selected racks.

  • B

    The 96 removable drying racks at Nilsen’s fish smokehouse

    Correct answer

    Bianca randomly selected the 6464 racks used to find the Two ratios set equal to each other, which you can solve for a missing number.Read the lesson from the 9696 removable drying racks at Nilsen’s fish smokehouse. Random sampling supports generalizing the proportion to that population.

  • C

    All 144 drying racks used at Nilsen’s fish smokehouse during inspection

    This extends the results to fixed racks, which had no chance of being selected. The sampling pool included only removable racks.

  • D

    The 64 drying racks randomly selected for inspection at Nilsen’s smokehouse

    This limits the results to the 6464 racks in the inspected sample. Because those racks were randomly selected, the results can be generalized to the population of removable racks from which they were drawn.

Solution

Bianca randomly selected 6464 racks from the smokehouse’s 9696 removable racks, so those 9696 racks form the population the sample can represent.

The table shows that 2121 of the 4242 selected racks holding at least 66 trays had space for another tray. The passage reports that 1010 of the other 2222 selected racks did too. Together, these results give a Two ratios set equal to each other, which you can solve for a missing number.Read the lesson of 31/6431/64 for all selected racks. Fixed racks were excluded from selection, so the largest population to which this proportion can be generalized is the 9696 removable drying racks at Nilsen’s fish smokehouse.

Can the study show cause?

Some studies just watch what people already do. Others give each person a treatment, which is whatever the researchers decide for that person, such as a desk type or a study method. Only the second kind can show cause, and only if the researchers decided at random who got what.

An office asks for volunteers and gets 4040. A researcher randomly assigns 2020 of them to standing desks and 2020 to seated desks. After 88 weeks, the standing-desk group reports less back pain.

Because chance decided who got which desk, the two groups should be about the same in every other way, such as age and how much they exercise. That leaves the desk to explain the difference.

Letting chance decide which treatment each person in a study gets. lets you say cause. Whom the results describe still depends on how people got into the study.

Right
Among these 40 volunteers, standing desks led to less back pain.
Wrong
Among all office workers, standing desks lead to less back pain.

“At random” describes who got which desk. The 40 chose to volunteer, so nothing says they're like office workers in general.

Now a study that only watches.

A researcher randomly selects 200200 of the 2,0002{,}000 workers at one company. Workers who already use standing desks report less back pain than workers who use seated desks.

Here the workers picked their own desks. The ones who chose standing desks may also exercise more, and that could explain the difference. Or it could run the other way, if people with less back pain find standing more comfortable. So the most you can say is that the two things are associated: “At this company, using a standing desk is associated with less back pain.” “Tends to” works too.

Trap: Cause from a study that only watched

“At this company, standing desks reduce back pain” fits the numbers. But “reduce” says the desks did it, and these workers chose their own desks.

What to do: Before you accept “causes,” “reduces,” “improves” or “leads to,” find the sentence where the researchers assigned the treatment at random. If there isn't one, cross the choice off.

Checking a conclusion

Random sampling and random assignment do separate jobs, and a study can have any mix of the two.

How the study was runWho the results describeCan it show cause?
Random sample and random assignmentThe whole group sampled fromYes
Random sample onlyThe whole group sampled fromNo, only an association
Random assignment onlyOnly the people studiedYes, for those people
NeitherOnly the people studiedNo, only an association

A researcher randomly selects 9090 of the 1,5001{,}500 students at one high school. She records how many hours each one sleeps on school nights and each one's average on first-period quizzes. Students who slept more tended to have higher quiz averages. Nobody was told how much to sleep.

Which of the following is the most appropriate conclusion based on the study?

  • A. At this school, sleeping more causes higher quiz averages.
  • B. Among all high school students in the state, sleeping more is associated with higher quiz averages.
  • C. At this school, sleeping more is associated with higher grades in every class.
  • D. At this school, sleeping more is associated with higher first-period quiz averages.

Check the verb first, then the group, then what was measured.

  • A says “causes,” but nobody was assigned an amount of sleep.
  • B names every high school in the state, and the sample came from one school.
  • C covers every class, and the study measured only first-period quizzes.
  • D passes all three checks.

B and C both say “associated with” and are still wrong, so the right verb isn't enough on its own. Watch for the opposite mistake too. A choice saying the results apply only to the 9090 students, because nothing was assigned, mixes up the two jobs. Not assigning rules out cause, and the random sample still lets the results reach all 1,5001{,}500 students.

Worked example

Moreau sawmill sells planks of several wood species. To investigate how plank length relates to sale price, Adisa randomly selected 64 planks from all oak planks sold by Moreau sawmill during April. For each selected plank, Adisa recorded its length and its sale price from the mill’s sales records. Longer planks tended to have higher sale prices. The records reflected ordinary sales; Adisa did not determine the planks’ dimensions or influence their prices. Production costs were not recorded.

Which of the following is the most appropriate conclusion based on the study?

  1. A

    Among oak planks sold by Moreau sawmill during April, increased plank length causes higher sale prices.

  2. B

    Among all planks sold by Moreau sawmill during April, increased plank length is associated with higher sale prices.

  3. C

    Among oak planks sold by Moreau sawmill during April, increased plank length is associated with higher sale prices.

  4. D

    Among oak planks sold by Moreau sawmill during April, increased plank length is associated with higher profits.

Show the answer
  • A

    Among oak planks sold by Moreau sawmill during April, increased plank length causes higher sale prices.

    This treats the observed association as cause and effect. Adisa recorded ordinary sales without randomly assigning plank lengths, so the study cannot establish that greater length causes a higher sale price.

  • B

    Among all planks sold by Moreau sawmill during April, increased plank length is associated with higher sale prices.

    This extends the association to every wood species sold by the mill. The random sample included only oak planks, so it does not support a conclusion about all planks.

  • C

    Among oak planks sold by Moreau sawmill during April, increased plank length is associated with higher sale prices.

    Correct answer

    The random sample supports generalizing the observed relationship to oak planks sold by Moreau sawmill during April. Longer planks tended to have higher sale prices, and recording ordinary sales without assigning plank lengths supports an association.

  • D

    Among oak planks sold by Moreau sawmill during April, increased plank length is associated with higher profits.

    This substitutes profit for the measured sale price. Profit depends on costs as well as sale price, and production costs were not recorded.

Solution

Adisa randomly selected 6464 planks from all oak planks sold by Moreau sawmill during April. That sampling method supports a conclusion about that population.

The recorded measurements were length and sale price, and longer planks tended to have higher sale prices. Adisa did not assign plank lengths or influence prices, so the study supports an association, not a causal claim.

The supported conclusion is that increased plank length is associated with higher sale prices among oak planks sold by Moreau sawmill during April. The sample does not support extending the conclusion to other wood species, and the missing cost data prevent a conclusion about profits.

Practice

For each question, say the group the sample was picked from, then check whether anyone was assigned a treatment at random.

Try it

5 questions on this skill, with every choice explained.

Start the drill

Next steps